The world of art is no stranger to controversy, but a new debate has emerged that has artists, lawyers, and technologists at odds. The question at the heart of the matter is this: Is AI-generated art infringing on the rights of artists?
In the ever-evolving world of artificial intelligence, the boundaries between human and machine creations are becoming increasingly blurred. AI-generated art, in particular, has been a subject of intense discussion, raising questions about authorship, creativity, and even the moral standing of AI systems. A notable study titled “On the Social-Relational Moral Standing of AI: An Empirical Study Using AI-Generated Art” provides a comprehensive exploration of this fascinating subject, offering valuable insights into how we perceive and interact with AI-generated art. Published two years ago, this study remains a significant reference in the discourse on AI and art.
Artificial Intelligence has come a long way, from assisting in mundane tasks to creating artwork, composing music, and even crafting poetry. The realm of AI-generated poetry is a fascinating one. With several AI models emerging as ‘poets,’ the question arises: how do these AI models differ in their approach to creating poetry? To answer this, we dove into a poetry slam with two prominent AI models – Bard and ChatGPT.